The Numbers Don’t Lie: Proof Of Fake News Confirmed

Here is the proof. The skinny on fake news.

By Saint John Hunt

Basically, I’m typing this for myself. I can’t imagine anyone with half a brain who is ignorant of the collusion between the main stream (fake) news media and their masters. The purpose of said collusion is to discredit the Trump administration by the non-stop reporting of fabricated “news” aimed at creating doubt in the public’s mind, with regard to their president.

The masters I speak of are in our own government, as well as foreign governments such as Bahrain. Back in 2013, CNN reporter Amber Lyon became a whistle blower against CNN, revealing that she got into journalism to expose wrong doing and found herself more and more under the will of CNN big dogs. They wanted her to bend and even outright fabricate the news.

She was not willing to keep quiet about that any longer.

Being an Emmy award winning CNN journalist, she learned first hand that our own government routinely pays CNN to selectively report on certain events and even make up fake news stories. Ms. Lyon said she was ordered to report fake stories, delete unfriendly stories adverse to the Obama (Hillary) administration, and construct stories in specific manners while working for the supposedly middle of the road news network.

So when Trump calls CNN a “fake news” station, he knows what he’s talking about.

My point is that for almost one year, CNN has spent a majority of their air time on one thing; spreading fake news about Trump “colluding” with the Russians. Not only that, they have reported on charging him with obstruction of justice, of being a racist, of being a woman hater, and countless other lies.

Here is the proof. The skinny on fake news.

Harvard released a study last week that analyzed The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and the main newscasts of CBS,CNN,FOX, and NBC during the first 100 days of Trump’s presidency. The Harvard team found that CBS coverage was 91 percent negative and 9 percent positive. New York Times was 87% negative and 17% positive. Wall Street Journal was 70% neg and 30% pos.

Get this, FOX coverage was 52% neg and 48% pos. (fair and balanced more than anyone else, but still tilted against Trump). And CNN? The Harvard researchers found CNN’s Trump coverage was 93% negative, and 7% positive.

“CNN’s coverage during his first 100 days set a new standard for negativity,” wrote the authors of the Harvard study.

In a 20 hour period there were 13 hours and 27 minutes of “news” coverage, and of that an incredible 92% was devoted to bashing the Trump presidency, with a little more than 3 minutes per hour devoted to all other news. There were 123 guest appearances in one day, with 96 of them being anti Trump and only 7 guests being pro Trump.

CNN’s own on air news analysts did even worse with 69 appearances by anti Trump analysts and only 2 pro Trump analysts.

Now let’s get to the Trump news. Former head of Dept. of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson stated under oath that he found no evidence that the Russians were successful at changing voter tallies or voter totals.   Johnson also stated under oath that he never saw any evidence that Trump or any member of Trump’s campaign colluded, conspired or coordinated with the Russians or anyone else to infiltrate or impact voter infrastructure.

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stated that there was no evidence of political collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

We saw former FBI director James Comey state under oath that he never saw any evidence of Trump collusion with the Russians. He confirmed that at no time was Trump under investigation and he stated that Trump did not request or order him to drop the Russian investigation. He did however reveal that Trump said “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go,” “He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”

Comey wrote these and other points in a series of memos shortly after his meeting with the President. Admitting that “I hope you can let this go” is not a direct request, he still felt that Trump was subtly asking him to influence the investigation.

President Trump disputes Comey’s account of their conversation.

What is troubling is the fact that sometime after their meeting, Comey leaked the contents of the memo to a friend at Columbia University with instructions he should in turn leak it to the New York Times. This is bizarre behavior for the head of FBI. There comes into question the legality of what Comey did, if not the intent of his actions and the honesty of his testimony.

He’s a slippery fellow.

His actions were to undermine Trump in a stalemate of unprovable accusations. With no evidence as to who said what, it comes down to whom do you believe? The damage to Trump has been calculated and ongoing.

With so much media hype about Trump and the Russians, with CNN raging non-stop fake news smearing the President some folks might tend to believe James Comey.

This brings us to the fact that (inquisitor) Robert Mueller is compelled to resign his position as special counsel due to conflict of interest.

The law governing the special counsel (28 CFR 600.7) specifically prohibits Mueller from serving if he has a “conflict of interest.” Even the appearance of a conflict is not allowed.

The same Code of Federal Regulations defines what constitutes a conflict. That is, “a personal relationship with any person substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution” (28 CFR 45.2).

Comey is that person. He was substantially involved in the conversation with President Trump, who may be the subject of an obstruction investigation. In fact, the former Director is the only other person involved. There were no witnesses beyond himself.

A conflict of interest is a situation in which an individual has competing interests or loyalties. Here, it sets up a clash between the special counsel’s self-interest or bias and his professional or public interest in discharging his responsibilities in a fair, objective and impartial manner.

His close association with the star witness raises the likelihood of prejudice or favoritism, which will stop the fair administration of justice.

Ah well, these are my notes because in 5 years I won’t believe that such a blatant witch hunt could be possible, hundreds of years after the last fire went out in Salem.

It’s a witch-hunt. CNN and the mainstream media are leading the inquisition and Trump loyalist must stand up and speak out for our President.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/the-numbers-dont-lie-proof-of-fake-news-confirmed/

Muller, Rosenstein, and Comey: The Three Amigos from the Deep State

By Roger Stone

There is a longtime and incestuous relationship between the fixers who have been tasked with taking down President Trump, under the fake narrative of enforcing the law.  James Comey worked in the DOJ directly under Mueller until 2005. Rod Rosenstein and Mueller go even further back.

James Comey wasn’t just some associate of Mueller back then, but rather his protégé.  Under the George W. Bush presidency, when Comey was serving as Deputy Attorney General under John Ashcroft, Robert Mueller was Comey’s go-to guy when he needed help.  The two men, as it came to light years later, conspired to disobey potential White House orders to leave Ashcroft alone when he was incapacitated in March of 2004.  These two men, when together, will not obey orders if they think they know better.  Being filled with hubris and almost two decades of doing just about anything they want, they always think they know better.

Rod Rosenstein, current Deputy Attorney General under Attorney General Jeff Sessions, is also a member of the Mueller Gang, having worked directly under Robert Mueller at the Department of Justice as far back as 1990.  When Comey was still working as the Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division for the U.S. Attorney’s office in New York, Mueller and Rosenstein were becoming thick as thieves.

We look back at Rod’s loyal work for Hillary Clinton, when he became a clean-up man for the Clinton Administration as an Associate Independent Counsel from 1995 until 1997. He supervised the investigation that found no basis for criminal prosecution of White House officials who had obtained classified FBI background reports. He did a great job covering for the Team Bill Clinton, including covering for Hillary, as she was one of the people who had access to the reports, and may have even requested them. Convenient for the Clintons, no indictments were filed.

Having proven his loyalty to the powers that be, Rosenstein was appointed to work in the US Office of the Independent Counsel under Ken Starr on the Whitewater Investigation into then President Bill Clinton. By some miracle, or clever work by insiders, the Clintons escaped culpability once again.  Rod wasn’t alone, he had help from his co-worker James Comey, who was also making sure the Clintons were exonerated during the Whitewater affair.

Here is Robert Mueller, sitting in the middle of his two wunderkinds, making sure the path before them is smooth and obstacle free, and practically shepherding their careers along the way.  Is it any wonder that once Jeff Sessions shamelessly recused himself from the Russia Collusion Conspiracy investigation and turned it over to his deputy Rod Rosenstein, that Rosenstein would reach out to his old mentor for help?  Who is surprised when three of the top lawman fixers for the Clinton/Bush cabal have axes in their eyes for President Donald J. Trump?

Enter Lisa Barsoomian, wife of Rod Rosenstein.  Lisa is a high-powered attorney in Washington, DC, who specializes in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the Deep State, err, I mean, the Intelligence Communities.

Lisa Barsoomian works for R. Craig Lawrence, an attorney who has represented Robert Mueller three times, James Comey five times, Barack Obama forty-five times, Kathleen Sebellius fifty-six times, Bill Clinton forty times, and Hillary Clinton seventeen times between 1991 and 2017.

Barsoomian participated in some of this work personally and has herself represented the FBI at least five separate times.  It would be great to research the specifics of the cases she worked in, many of the documents from the Court Docket relating to these cases have been removed from the D.C. District and Appeals Court, including her representation for Clinton in 1998’s case Hamburg. V. Clinton.

Her loyalties are clearly with the entities that make up the Deep State, as are her husbands.

They are a DC Globalist Power Couple, and they mean to destroy Donald Trump under the bidding of their Globalist Masters.  Rod Rosenstein should not have any position in President Trump’s administration, let alone one with so much power to harm the Office of the Presidency.

Mueller is also a Deep State lackey, even acting as delivery boy for Hillary’s State Department, hand transporting ten grams of highly enriched uranium under the auspices of counter-terror. It must only be coincidence that this happened at the same time as Hillary and her henchman John Podesta were nurturing the Uranium One deal that would see Russia take control over 20% of America’s proven uranium reserves.  Shortly after the Russia uranium deal closed, the Clinton Foundation was showered with many millions of dollars from Russian donors.

Comey, Rosenstein, and their patron Mueller are truly the Three Amigos of the Deep State.  Joined long ago in mutual regard, owing allegiance only to each other and the enshrined bureaucracy that created them.  As their actions show, they desire to thwart the will of the people and depose the duly elected President of the United States of America by using all the powers at their disposal.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/muller-rosenstein-and-comey-the-three-amigos-from-the-deep-state/

MEET THE LEAKER WHO TRIED TO TAKE DOWN DONALD TRUMP

MSM HIDES NEW HILLARY PROBE

(By Saint John Hunt)

CNN and MSNBC should rename their “news” shows. I say this because they have a singular purpose and it has nothing to do with news. I used to watch those stations but they’ve become more like Fantasy Island than a news service. I would rather they rename their shows so as not confuse people who actually want the news. Maybe “the Dump on Trump Hour” would be a good name change. They must believe that old saying, “If you repeat a lie enough times, it becomes a fact.” Who’s running the show over there? Those “reporters” act as if making stuff up and bringing in guests to talk about it is an evolutionary step that warrants serious attention. Well, it’s not.

I place news hosts in the same league as Robo the robotic vacuum cleaner. Does anybody want Robo to start giving advice as he sweeps around the room? Hell no! Shut up and suck that dirt. Same as those folks over there at CNN and MSNBC. Since when are we interested in their opinion? Their job is to report the news and let us, the audience make our own opinions. Just because someone sits at a desk all day and reads a teleprompter doesn’t make them intelligent. It makes them good at reading a teleprompter and that’s it. If I want to hear an opinion I’ll listen to a William F Buckley or a Noam Chomsky. It’s like this folks, just because someone sells telescopes all day doesn’t make them an astrophysicist. If I want an opinion about deep space I’ll ask Neil deGrasse Tyson.

There have been a few actual newsworthy items that those “news” shows have overlooked. Here’s one: As the campaign to bring charges of obstruction of justice against President Trump fails to find one single bit of evidence there is more than enough evidence to require a new investigation into another politician. Can you guess? Why it’s Hillary Clinton of course. Here’s the scoop. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Chairman Chuck Grassley, has launched a new investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton! If you weren’t aware of that it might just be because most of the “news” services like CNN and MSNBC don’t have time to report on something real. They’re too busy trying to pass their opinions as “news.”

Last May, it was reported that during her time as sec. of state, Hillary Clinton sent top U.S. diplomats to pressure Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to stop her corruption investigation of Muhammad Yunus, a Clinton Foundation donor and close friend of the Clintons. Yunus at the time was managing director of the state-owned Bangladesh Bank The State Department officials sent by Hillary threatened Sajeeb Wazed, the son of Bangladesh Prime Minister Hasina with a tax audit if he failed to get his mother to drop the Yunus investigation. “They threatened me with the possibility of an audit by the Internal Revenue Service,” Wazed said. “They would say repeatedly, ‘Yunus has powerful friends’ and we all knew they were talking of Secretary Clinton. Everybody knew it was Mrs. Clinton.” “Furthermore, he was told by these same officials that Yunus was communicating with Secretary Clinton and her staff for assistance and, in turn, Secretary Clinton’s staff put pressure on the Embassy in Bangladesh to intercede on Yunus’ behalf.” Wazed has lived in the U.S. for seventeen years.

In 2011 Yunus was stripped of his directorship of the state owned Grameen Bank for gross financial mismanagement and his failed loan program supposedly aimed at lifting poor Bangladesh women out of poverty with micro loans. With high interest rates and payback schedules, some women were driven to suicide. Yunus diverted up to $100 million intended for Grameen Bank to his other organization and donated between $100,000-$250,000 to the Clinton Global Initiative and $25,000-$50,000 to the Clinton foundation. Yunus eventually did return most of the money but the damage had been done. As an investigation was launched, he reached out to Hillary Clinton for help in stopping the investigation. She sent Deputy Chief of Mission to Bangladesh Jon Danilowicz who threatened Wazed with the IRS tax audit.

An investigation into Hillary’s attempt at obstruction of a foreign government’s judicial process is just the latest of many probes and investigations into Hillary Clinton. While the collusion with the Russians has been debunked, and there is and never was anything which could bring charges of obstruction against Trump, it is the Democrats own presidential hopeful, shining example and sore loser of all time, Hillary Clinton that is under investigation. They don’t need 1 year and a half to find evidence of obstruction with Hillary, it’s right there on top, if, the “news personas” would just report the news and not grace us with opinions of matters of which they have no firsthand knowledge.

Sources:

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/04/senate-committee-launches-a-new-clinton
-investigation/

http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/06/08/u-s-state-department-plans-response-to-hillary-clinton-probe-request.html

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/msm-hides-hillary-probe/

CNN AND CANNABIS – MORE FAKE NEWS

By Roger Stone

I am used to CNN acting as a propagandist rather than a news organization, but the Cable News Network’s coverage of my keynote speech to the 2017 Cannabis World Congress and Business Expo in New York City last week really underlines the extent to which CNN is fake news.

Speaking at the exposition, I announced that I would be working with Democratic Party activist, marijuana advocate, and Orlando Florida trial attorney John Morgan, in a bipartisan coalition called The United States Cannabis Coalition (USCC). We will persuade President Trump to honor the commitment he made during the Presidential campaign to support state’s rights to legalize cannabis and to protect the medicinal marijuana industry in the 29 states that have legalized it.

I also pointed out that Attorney General Sessions announced position that the DOJ should begin enforcing Federal law against possession and distribution in those states is inconsistent with the President’s position. Incredibly, CNN Reporter Aaron Smith fails to mention this conflict which was the entire crux of my remarks.

Specifically, Smith wrote “He (Stone) spent much of his speech bashing Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who opposes legalization. He called out Sessions for a recent request to Congress for approval to crack down on state-legal marijuana”, which is out of context without reference to the President’s stated position in the campaign. Fake news indeed.

CNN reported that the principle objective of the United States Cannabis Coalition is the legalization of cannabis at the federal level when in fact I made it clear that legalization by the US Congress, a long and difficult battle, was a last resort in the event that a runaway Justice Department reverses what President Trump outlined in the campaign.

I did make it clear that in addition to our efforts to urge the President to honor his pledge to support medicinal marijuana that we would advocate for the rescheduling of cannabis which is currently on the Schedule I list. With the rescheduling of cannabis, physicians could prescribe cannabis for their patients who could medicinally benefit. We also advocate new and adequate funding for unbiased research into the potential medicinal and commercial uses of cannabis and hemp. Well-funded and broadly conducted research in Israel has indicated that these plants have enormous potential for health benefits, healing and inexpensive industrial use.

CNN also tried to dispute my claim to having communicated with other pro-Cannabis organizations prior to the launch of the USCC. A spokeswoman for NORML initially denied that I had any contact with the group but then later admitted that I had spoken to a “board member”. In fact, my conversations with NORML were not with just a board member but with the chairman of the organization, who confirmed that he was fully supportive.

That I am undertaking this fight should be a surprise to no one. I have written in support of and marched for drug law reform for over 20 years. Leaving decisions to the individual about what they will ingest, smoke or who they will marry to me seems to be the essence of pro-liberty conservatism in the tradition of Barry Goldwater, who wanted government out of the bedroom and out of the boardroom. It’s big state liberalism that seeks to impose on us what the government will allow in terms of our personal habits and activities.

The response at the CWCB Expo was encouraging. I stress that the challenge ahead is daunting. Donald Trump has expressed skepticism about the war on drugs and posited legalization as a solution almost 15 years ago. More recently however the President was quoted as saying that Colorado’s highly successful legalization of Cannabis has been “a disaster”. In view of the multi-million-dollar revenue the legalization of Cannabis has brought Colorado and the drop in Opioid deaths, opioid addiction, drug overdose deaths and all petty crimes, it’s hard to understand where the President could have gotten this disinformation.

In my 40-year relationship with Donald Trump I have noted that when he has all of the information, he almost invariably makes the right decision. The President is not an ideologue but rather a pragmatist guided by common sense; he is interested in real results rather than philosophical purity. I am convinced he will see the correctness of the position he forthrightly took during the Presidential campaign to support the people’s decision to legalize medicinal marijuana.

The principal purpose of the United States Cannabis Coalition is to persuade the President to honor that commitment. Additionally, we plan to urge the President to reclassify Cannabis and take it off the Schedule I list, so that physicians nationwide could prescribe it for patients who they believe it would benefit.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/cnn-and-cannabis-more-fake-news/

THE NEW YORK TIMES GETS IT WRONG

By Roger Stone

 The New York Times considers itself the “newspaper of record” but the Old Grey Lady has had a difficult time of it recently. Not only did FBI director James Comey say that the Times story of February 14^th, 2017 which alleged contacts between associates of Donald Trump and the Russian state was false but now The New York Times has compounded that error.

In a chart titled “How Seven Trump Associates Have Been Linked to Russia” by Jasmine C. Lee and Alicia Parlapiano which appeared Sunday, June 11^th, 2017, the facts regarding my alleged contact with the Russians are entirely incorrect.

“Stone has said that he knew in advance of Russian hacked documents by Wikileaks” said the Times. In fact, I have never said that I knew in advance or predicted the hacking of any emails.  Nor do I concede that the Russians are responsible for the hacking of the Democratic National Committee, a claim for which our intelligence services have provided no proof.

The NY Times says that I claimed to have “a perfectly legal communication” with Julian Assange, the Wikileaks founder. Although on one occasion I did say that I had “communicated” with Assange through a mutual friend. I clarified that my communication was through this mutual friend who was my source in dozens of interviews. I have never had any direct communications with Julian Assange. I did say that such communications would be “perfectly legal” because they were.

The New York Times is correct when they say I had a brief exchange with the hacker Guccifer 2.0. I have subsequently released the entire text of this direct message exchange on Twitter. The inference that this limited communications with Guccifer 2.0 constitutes collusion is disproved by the content, timing in context of the exchange. The contents are entirely benign and the timing of the exchange is six weeks after the publication of the DNC emails by Wikileaks making collusion between Guccifer 2.0 and myself in the purloining of those documents impossible.

I have repeatedly demanded that I be allowed to testify for the Senate and House Intelligence Committees to correct repeated misstatements by members of the committee regarding my statements and activities of 2016. I am prepared to testify voluntarily and without subpoena as well as requesting no immunity. I do insist that my testimony be taken in public since these misleading and inaccurate statements have been made about me by members of both committees in public sessions. The House committee has proposed closed door testimony saying that a transcript of the hearing would be released “sometime in the future”. Such an arrangement would allow mischaracterization about what is said behind closed doors and would lend itself to further distortions of the public record.

Congressman Adam Schiff, the ranking member of the House committee, has specifically made a series of misleading and false statements about my 2016 activities as has Representative Eric Swalwell. It’s time for these ambitious politicians to stop hiding behind their committee lawyers and face the consequences of their recklessness

I note that Attorney General Jeff Sessions testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee being held today is a public session. I deserve nothing less.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/the-new-york-times-gets-it-wrong/

WHO IS DINA HABIB POWELL AND WHY YOU SHOULD CARE

(By Roger Stone) In January 2017, Dina Habib Powell joined the Trump White House and is currently the U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategy formerly serving as an Assistant to the President and Senior Counselor for Economic Initiatives.

How did this ex-Bush White House aide who is best friends with Hillary’s gal pal, confidant, advisor, and vice chair of her 2016 campaign for the presidency Huma Abedin, Obama White House Chief of Staff Valery Jarrett and discredited Bush National Security Advisor Condi Rice who walked us into the Iraq war over weapons of mass destruction that did not exist get this job ?

How did this gglobalist insider and ardent neo-con land a key spot in the Trump circle?

The answer lies in Presidential son-in-law Jared Kushner and his wife Ivanka.  Having not only inserted this fifth column in the Trump White House , Jared and Ivanka now hope to make the quisling Powell the White House Chief of Staff if (when) current Trump Chief of Staff Reince Priebus goes.

Forty three year old Dina Powell was born in Cairo, Egypt on June 23, 1973.  Her family moved to the United States when she was four, settling in Texas.  She learned to speak English quickly while continuing to speak fluent Farsi. She attended the Ursuline Academy for Girls in Dallas and later went to the University of Texas-Austin where she earned a bachelor’s degree.

In 1988 she married Richard Powell, a senior public affairs executive.   They have two daughters.  Her first brush with politics came when she interned with Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison.  During G.W. Bush’s presidency, she served as Assistant Secretary of State for Education and Cultural Affairs and at 29, became the youngest person to direct the White House personnel office.

In 2007 she joined Goldman Sachs as a managing director and became a partner in 2010, recently serving as the president for the Goldman Sachs Foundation and Goldman Sachs Impact Investing team working primarily on philanthropic efforts. Goldman, you will remember, was a major funding source for Hillary’s campaign as well as stuffing $675,000 in Hillary’s pocket for a speech the former First Lady refused to release.

The neo-cons are wild about Dina. Dick Cheney’s daughter Liz said “She is such an effective spokesperson for us, because she speaks Arabic and is an Arab woman and can stand up as a role model and as somebody who can defuse some of the misconceptions.”  “She’s so bright,” just a bright shiny star.”

“Dina Powell is a tremendous talent and has a stellar record of public service as well as a great career in the private sector,” the President said in a statement. “She has been recognized for her strategic oversight of key programs and initiatives and is a leader in both economic growth and the crucial empowerment of women in various aspects of business development and entrepreneurial endeavors.”  Clearly , the President knows little of Powells’s pedigree or background.

Trump’s White House has been leaking since the start and it’s no surprise that Dina Powell has long been considered a leaker.  In 1990 she got in trouble for leaking negative stories on Ginny Thomas, the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas. Now she and National Security Advisor H R McMaster have been pegged by sources at the National Security Council as two of Trump’s major leakers!   President Trump has surrounded himself with double crossing double agents who will do him harm. Let’s hope he wakes up before it is too late.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/who-is-dina-habib-powell-and-why-you-should-care/

LOCK BROCK UP: Clinton Ally Headed For Jail As IRS Purge Looms

Media Matters founder David Brock has pocketed over $1million in unreported lease income. Trump administration shakeup at IRS could mean jail-time for the top Clinton aide.

By Roger Stone

It might soon be David Brock’s “time in the barrel,” according to high-level sources at the IRS, who are signaling a massive firing will take place in order to clean house from the Obama-era.

Over the past eight years, the IRS has unfairly targeted conservative groups and individuals while ignoring several glaring omissions on Media Matters tax filings. Media Matters is a “non-profit” group funded by liberal billionaires and special interests.

David Brock, a former conservative who turned his back on the GOP for a hefty payday from the Clinton Crime Cartel, has pocketed $1,052,000.00 from sub-leasing the Media Matters office space since 2010.

Thirteen office spaces share the same address as the 6th floor of 455 Massachusetts Avenue NW in Washington D.C. A report from The Citizens Audit in December of 2016 exposed numerous discrepancies in Media Matters federal tax filings and legally required state paperwork.

Those federal tax filings show that Brock’s Media Matters failed to disclose the sub-lease rental income, while other documents filed by the group admit to receiving rent money.

Documents showing a lower floor unit office space in the same building prove that Media Matters is over-reporting their true expenses and thus pocketing the sub-lease income, tax free. In the past four years, this scheme has netted Mr. Brock and his allies anywhere from $115,000 to $290,000 annually.

Aside from this Capone-style tax evasion, one has to wonder what Brock has done with his ill-gotten gain. I’m told he has a fondness for wearing women’s underwear and we presume he has expanded his collection extensively as he evades the IRS.

Now, as President Trump plans to clean house at the IRS and dramatically reduce the staff, Brock’s crimes are ripe for reexamination. With Obama lackeys getting dropped by the hundreds at the IRS, Mr. Brock will no longer have the institutional protection provided by the Clintons by way of President Obama.

Pursuing charges against Brock and Media Matters would be the logical first step for the Trump administration, as investigators work further to solidify their case against Hilary Clinton.

Who knows what Brock might reveal about the inner-workings of Clinton world in turn for a reduced sentence or fine. He turned his back back on the Republican Party and conservative cause for a quick buck, as they say… everyone has a price.

What will his price be to Benedict Arnold the House of Clinton?

We still want to #LockHerUp… but for now we will settle for David Brock. #LockBrockUp… #LockBrockUp… DEMAND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INVESTIGATE DAVID BROCK!

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/lock-brock-up-clinton-ally-headed-for-jail-as-irs-purge-looms/

COMEY THOUGHT HE KNEW OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN HILLARY CASE

Furthered the obstruction instead of reporting it

By Roger Stone

Former FBI Director James Comey thought he saw proof of obstruction of justice in the Hillary Clinton email case, but rather than report it as an officer of the court he furthered the obstruction.

Comey wants to talk about memos and obstruction? The President and his defenders must turn the tables and bore in on this fact. The President has already said he may live tweet during Mr. Comey’s testimony to “correct the record.”

The source of this shocking expose is the Washington Post which documents that Comey decided to give Hillary a pass only after seeing and believing in the authenticity of a memo the FBI had intercepted claiming Obama’s DOJ Chief, Attorney General Loretta Lynch had assured a Clinton associate that DOJ would not vigorously pursue the case against Hillary for use of an illegal server and using an unsecure server for classified documents. That document has been discredited as a forgery.

Comey embraced it over the disagreement about it’s province in the FBI!

If the Republicans start here in their questioning of Comey, nothing else he says will have a shred of credibility. He abetted what he thought was obstruction of Justice by the highest Law Enforcement officer in the Country, the Attorney General.

James Comey is truly a piece of work.
This wasn’t the first time he had given a pass to the Clintons. In the mid-1990’s, Comey joined the Senate Whitewater Committee as deputy director. The Clintons’ were being investigated for fraud in connection with a real estate deal. The Clintons’ were given a pass while two of their closest friends and business partners, Jim and Susan McDougal along with Arkansas Governor Jim Tucker were convicted and received prison time. Jim McDougal died in jail because he was denied the medication he needed to survive.

No one made money on Whitewater except for Bill Clinton who grabbed $850,000 to finance the closing TV blitz that put Clinton back in the Governor’s mansion after Bill’s earlier hubris had ended in his surprise defeat for re-election. Bill escaped charges thanks to Mr. Comey.

In 2002 as a federal prosecutor, Comey took over an investigation into President Bill Clinton’s 2001 pardon of financier Marc Rich who was on the lam. Rich was a former hedge-fund manager who had been indicted on multiple counts of tax evasion, wire fraud, and racketeering. Rich, at the time of the pardon was an international fugitive who fled to Switzerland.

Astoundingly James Comey was the prosecutor in the case against Rich. Then in 2002, he took over the investigation of Clinton’s pardon of the same fugitive. After Rich’s wife contributed $450,000 to the Clinton library fund and $70,000 to Hillary’s Senate campaign the wheels were greased enough to get the pardon put before President Clinton without going through the DOJ review process. After Rich kicked in another million dollars, the pardon was set.

Comey is also assigned to the Sandy Berger case. Berger, who served as Clinton’s National Security Advisor, stole documents that showed Clinton could have killed Osama Bin Laden before 9/11 but didn’t. The corpulent Berger got caught stuffing the documents down his ample pants. Berger, of course, was not charged with DOJ’s James Comey investigating the case.

In 2005, Comey joined Lockheed Martin as senior vice president and general counsel. Lockheed Martin is the world’s biggest government defense contractor in global aerospace, defense, and security raking in $36.2 billion in 2015. Lockheed has also committed more fraud than any other contractor. In the five years that James Comey acted as Lockheed’s general counsel and senior vice president, Lockheed had been caught in these cases.

In January 2005, Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control agreed to pay $1.4 million to resolve allegations of falsely charging the U.S. Army in connection with its production and support contracts for the Multiple Launch Rocket System.

In 2007 Lockheed agreed to repay the federal government $265 million plus interest in connection with overbilling for work on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The company called the overbilling “inadvertent.”

A February 2008, U.S. Government Accountability Office report singled out Lockheed’s F-22A fighter plane in a review of weapons systems plagued by large cost overruns, delays and quality problems. (The following year the Senate voted to terminate the F-22 program).

In June 2008, the Project on Government Oversight made public a 2007 report by the Defense Contract Management Agency that found Lockheed failed to follow 19 of 32 Pentagon guidelines on tracking and managing costs on major weapons programs.

In August 2008, Lockheed agreed to pay $4 million to settle charges that it failed to get permission to sell missiles to the United Arab Emirates and that the company revealed classified information during negotiations with the Persian Gulf nation

In 2009, the Pentagon said that Lockheed would have to pay part of the huge cost overruns on the delay-ridden F-35 fighter jet project. In December 2010, Lockheed agreed to pay $10.28 million to resolve federal charges that it over billed the Air Force and the Navy for the C-27J tactical aircraft.

Comey was paid $6 million in one year alone from Lockheed. Comey left Lockheed in 2010 but not before convincing Lockheed to become a Clinton Foundation donor and a Clinton Global Initiative member. In 2010, Lockheed won 17 approvals for private contracts from Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

Now, incredibly we learn that Comey let Hillary off the hook after consuming intel that indicated that Attorney General Lorretta Lynch had assured the Clinton campaign that she would contain the probe. This ‘intel” turned out to be a forgery although who produced the forgery is unknown. But it purports to show a clear act of obstruction by Mr. Comey.

Let’s let the Washington Post take it from there;

“Current and former officials have argued that the secret document gave Comey good reason to take the extraordinary step over the summer of announcing the findings of the Clinton investigation himself without Justice Department involvement……..”

“Comey had little choice, these people have said, because he feared that if Lynch announced no charges against Clinton, and then the secret document leaked, the legitimacy of the entire case would be questioned………”

“Then on July 5, Comey decided to announce on his own — without telling Lynch ahead of time — that he was closing the Clinton email case without recommending charges against anyone. Aides to Comey said he decided to act alone after Lynch met privately with Bill Clinton for nearly a half-hour on an airport tarmac in Phoenix about a week earlier — and have since said privately the Russian document was also a factor in that decision………”

The secret intelligence document has attracted so much attention recently that Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) asked Comey about it during the director’s final public appearance in Congress as FBI director before he was fired.

Comey said that he had spoken with the heads of the congressional intelligence committees about the document privately but that it was too sensitive to discuss it in public. “The subject is classified, and in an appropriate forum I’d be happy to brief you on it,” he told the Senate Judiciary Committee. “But I can’t do it in an open hearing,“ the former FBI Director said.

In 2013 James Comey became a board member, a director and a Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee member of the London bank HSBC Holdings. HSBC is noted as the world’s most corrupt bank. In 2012, HSBC was fined a mere $1.9 billion for laundering drug money and violating U.S. sanctions against Iran. Yet no one went to jail for this drug-related mega-crime. The $1.9 billion fine was sold by Comey to Loretta Lynch our Attorney General. Lynch used the “deferred prosecutions” under which criminal charges against a firm are set aside in lieu of a fine.

So less than one year after HSBC pays the $1.9 billion fine, and HSBC Execs avoid serious jail time and after HSBC is found to be the most corrupt bank in the world, James Comey joins the board of directors at the recommendation of Barack Obama. How much was he paid for helping the HSBC criminals avoid jail? What were his “board fees’?

In less than a year after that, Comey was tapped by Obama to head the FBI. President Trump was wise to fire this nut job.

 

Sources:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/06/29/attorney-general-meets-with-former-president-clinton-amid-politically-charged-investigation-into-his-wifes-email/?utm_term=.1dc4ec0d0adc

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-chief-plans-remarks-to-media-amid-heightened-focus-on-clinton-email-probe/2016/07/05/a53513c4-42b9-11e6-bc99-7d269f8719b1_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.a7fe74d8c63c

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/comey-nut-job/

Dem Lawmaker Walks Out of Town Hall Event After Crowd Starts Chanting “We Love Trump!” (VIDEO)

Why is this not on news? Rep. Nanette Barragan (D-CA) held a town hall event last week at Stephen M. White School in Carson, California.

The Democrat lawmaker ran from the venue after the pro-Trump crowd started chanting, “We love Trump!”

This was insane!  The pro-Trump crowd started screaming and chanting in the opening minutes of the town hall event.

That’s when Rep. Barragan cut from the event and walked out of the auditorium.

Barragan is in her first term…..and hopefully her last.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/dem-lawmaker-walks-out-of-town-hall-event-after-crowd-starts-chanting-we-love-trump-video/

Liberal Reactions to London Muslim Attack

The liberals reaction to the attack by Muslims in London should be call to America that we can not “tolerate” political correctness anymore.  The Western civilized world is under attack, yet the liberals use this as opportunity to promote political correctness!

Liberalism is a disease that infects the brains ability to think rationally.

I am proud and extremely thankful that we have President Trump in office.   He is not only America’s last hope, but the world’s last hope.

Only one thing could be nearly as appalling as Muslims’ blood-drenched pursuit of evil to please their evil god: liberals’ reaction to it.

After the Islamic atrocity in London last night, an initial response by the Islamophile liberal media was to accuse us of overreacting to the carnage:

During a live telephone conversation with Mustafa Tameez, a former consultant to the Department of Homeland Security, [MSNBC’s Richard] Lui asked that, when it comes to the police dealing with apparent terror attacks if there “was any risk of overreaction.” Again, the earliest reports suggest multiple fatalities, stabbings and London police under extreme duress trying to keep their city safe. And the question asked was the risk of the police “overreacting.”

Despite the Muslims shouting “This is for Allah” as they killed, the supposed grownups at NBC News initially questioned whether it was even a terror attack — or maybe they were just trying to get in yet another juvenile dig:

 

Pres. Trump has used Twitter to share news report on London incident.

We aren’t relaying president’s retweet, as the info is unconfirmed.

— NBC Nightly News (@NBCNightlyNews) June 3, 2017

Hollyweird draws a lesson from this latest Muslim atrocity:

More sorrow and grief at the hands of madmen in London. Men and religion are worthless.

— Bette Midler (@BetteMidler) June 3, 2017

The objective for liberals is to work propaganda judo on us, refocusing our horror and rage away from people they favor (Muslims, immigrants) and toward the enemies of their choice, which include men and Christians. This is accomplished in part through the preposterous conflation of Islam with its polar opposite, Christianity. Blaming men is very nearly as insane; you might just as sensibly blame mammals or vertebrates.

When Trump responded to the horror by reminding us of the importance of limiting the number of people pouring into the country from terrorist breeding grounds, CNN host Reza Aslan responded to the response:

Islam inspiring maniacs to murder random innocent people isn’t an embarrassment to humankind. Trump is — for attempting to keep these maniacs out of our country.

Elsewhere at CNN, Sally Kohn reveals the influence of Katy Perry on her intellectual development:

“Political correctness is simple idea everyone should be treated with equal dignity [and] respect. It’s not cause of terrorism. It’s antidote,” Kohn wrote in a series of tweets. “When we make political correctness the scapegoat, we undermine values of tolerance and equality that are ALWAYS our best weapon against hate.”

Muslims have been trying to wipe out Western Civilization for 1,400 years. The reason they are stepping up the campaign lately — and experiencing such dramatic success — can be summed up in two words: “political correctness.” It has made the West vulnerable in a way it has not been since the Byzantine Empire crumbled.

As for political reactions on the left, Theresa May (who by current British standards is actually considered right of center) wants to use the bloodshed as a pretext to censor the Internet — even as she presides over a government that continues to allow Muslims to colonize her country, an inevitable result of which is Islamic terror attacks, which work to accelerate the displacement of the native population by making it feel defeated.

Given the situation our quisling “leaders” have put us in by importing (and using the welfare state to breed) millions of Islamists within our own borders, we have three options: (1) get serious about minimizing Islam’s presence in the West; (2) convert to Islam; or (3) blather contemptibly about Islamophobia, mumble platitudes and euphemisms, chase our tails while pretending this is a law enforcement issue, and continue to allow Muslims to colonize Western countries, as the terror attacks become ever more frequent and ever more innocent people die.

Being composed of liberals, our ruling class nearly unanimously agrees that the best choice is option 3. In the long run, this leads inevitably to option 2, so they might as well convert right now and get it over with. Special hat tip to Moonbattery for this update.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/liberal-reactions-to-london-muslim-attack/