Exposed: Islamic Supremacists of North America

There has been a shift in the jihad that is waged today, it is called STEALTH JIHAD. It is weaving in Islamic extremism, using the cover of free speech.

By Taylor Foland

The Islamic Society of North America, or as it should be called: the Islamic Supremacists of North America, is a very dangerous group in the United States of America. They have been intimately connected with several Islamic Fundamentalists such as Anwar Awlaki. The Islamic Society of North America was founded in 1982, in Plainfield, Indiana well before the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan know as: “The Project” was discovered by our country’s intelligence apparatus.

The plan lists in detail the ways that Muslims can commence stealth jihad. A sister-organization of CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations), ISNA’s official mission statement is: “To foster the development of the Muslim community, interfaith relations, civic engagement, and better understanding of Islam.” Their vison is: “To be an exemplary and unifying Islamic organization in North America that contributes to the betterment of the Muslim community and society at large.” Note the word: “unifying”, do not be deceived.

The goal of this radical Islamic organization is to resurrect the Caliphate, the Caliphate that existing as it was in the seventh century. It is also no surprise that in the 1980s, terrorism began to take root in the West. ISNA was the organization that held a conference where Anwar al-Awlaki spoke; the radical imam from New Mexico. ISNA hosted the radical imam on September 1, 2001, just ten days before 9/11.

This is an organization that hides behind their hijabs, niqabs, and burqas.

This is an organization that uses the First Amendment of our Constitution to push their radical agenda forward. ISNA was one of the twenty-nine Islamic organizations listed by the Muslim Brotherhood to destroy Western civilization, create an internal Caliphate, destroy America, and then make Islam the universal religion practiced by all.

ISNA was also connected with the Holy Land Foundation Trial in Richardson, Texas. Our government handed down 108 guilty verdicts on the charity(ies) involved in funding terrorism. The foundation had its assets frozen, and then seized by our government. In an official FBI report entitled: “No Cash for Terror: Convictions Returned in Holy Land Case”, we get the full picture:

“For many years, the Holy Land Foundation used the guise of charity to raise and funnel millions of dollars to the infrastructure of the Hamas terror organization, said Patrick Rowan, Assistant Attorney General for National Security. This prosecution demonstrates our resolve to ensure that humanitarian relief efforts are not used as a mechanism to disguise and enable support for terrorist groups.”

For readers to understand where all the hate comes from, you must look back at the foundation of Islam. After the supposed Prophet Muhammad received his supposed revelation from the Archangel Gabriel on Mount Hira, he began a process of recruitment. ‘Recruitment’ meaning spreading Islam. The first ten years of Islam was a building process, Muhammad was first recruiting his family into the Islamic faith.

When Muhammad wanted to expand the new religion, he went to Yathrib, known now as Medina. Let’s speak very clearly, Muhammad went to Medina to convert the Jews and Christians. When the Jews and the Christians refused the new faith, this is when things became violent with Islam. There was an important treaty signed outside Medina, known as the Al-Hudaybiyyah Treaty. This treaty was supposed to symbolize peace between the Jews/Christians and Muhammad and his followers.

This is the Arabic term for Al-Hudaybiyyah: صلح الحديبية If you translate this term into English using Google Translate, or any other interpretation device, it will say: ‘Hudaibiya reconciliation.’ This was NO reconciliation. This was the point in history from which Muhammad waged jihad, and established the first Caliphate. Muhammad moved his followers into place, and attacked, in 624 A.D. at the Battle of Badr (Southwest Medina), and a year later at the Battle of Uhud in 625 A.D. Muhammad marched his army to the gates of Jerusalem (636-637 A.D.) conquering it easily with his freshly supplied troops.

Christians could not attend mass freely, Jews could not blow the shofar. The protection tax or ‘Jizyah’ (Arabic: جزية) (Ottoman Turkish: جزيه) was a tax levied on non-Muslims, non-Muslims could either pay, or be stoned to death.

Now people may ask: “Why is this history so important?” This history is important, because of its longevity into the future. Since 622 C.E. there has been jihad waged on infidels (الكفار) or Alkuffar. This is how the Islamic Caliphate grew in its size and its capabilities. How does this connect to ISNA though? ISNA has hosted many speakers and has associated with many persons suspected of terrorism. There have been leaders within ISNA that have been directly tied to jihadism, and sympathize with Hamas and Hezbollah. Such as Muzammil Siddiqi, Parvez Ahmed, Anwar al-Awlaki, and many others.

Look at the detailed report below entitled: “An ITP Investigative Report” compiled by the Investigative Project On Terrorism.

ISNA hosted the infamous imam at the 2001 ISNA Convention when he talks about Saladin and the King of England, Richard the Lionheart. See the video here.

In this speech, Awlaki clearly states that: “The Palestinian issue should be something we are concerned about day and night. We should participate and support this uprising and let them know that the American Muslims are with you.” Blatant Islamic fascism, that is still prevalent today! Is this clear? This is what the Islamists want! It’s also notable, that ISNA and its sister organization: CAIR, have both endorsed the radical anti-Semite Linda Sarsour, who wants sharia and jihad in America!

In conclusion, the Islamic Supremacists of North America are creating an atmosphere of intimidation and separatism. Jihadism has been going on for over 1,400 years now. There has been a shift in the jihad that is waged today, it is called STEALTH JIHAD. It is weaving in Islamic extremism, using the cover of free speech.

Very simple words for the readers: they hate us, because we are infidels, nothing more, and nothing less.

 

Taylor Foland is a Volunteer Coordinator for ACT For America, the nation’s largest grassroots national security group. ACT has over 750,000 members and 1,000 allied volunteers groups across America.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/exposed-islamic-supremacists-of-north-america/

Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

(Consortiumnews.com)

In a memo to President Trump, a group of former U.S. intelligence officers, including NSA specialists, cite new forensic studies to challenge the claim of the key Jan. 6 “assessment” that Russia “hacked” Democratic emails last year. 

MEMORANDUM FOR: The President

FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

SUBJECT: Was the “Russian Hack” an Inside Job?

Executive Summary

Forensic studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2016, data was leaked (not hacked) by a person with physical access to DNC computers, and then doctored to incriminate Russia.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (right) talks with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, with John Brennan and other national security aides present. (Photo credit: Office of Director of National Intelligence)

After examining metadata from the “Guccifer 2.0” July 5, 2016 intrusion into the DNC server, independent cyber investigators have concluded that an insider copied DNC data onto an external storage device, and that “telltale signs” implicating Russia were then inserted.

Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying and doctoring were performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies [see hereand here].

Independent analyst Skip Folden, a retired IBM Program Manager for Information Technology US, who examined the recent forensic findings, is a co-author of this Memorandum. He has drafted a more detailed technical report titled “Cyber-Forensic Investigation of ‘Russian Hack’ and Missing Intelligence Community Disclaimers,” and sent it to the offices of the Special Counsel and the Attorney General. VIPS member William Binney, a former Technical Director at the National Security Agency, and other senior NSA “alumni” in VIPS attest to the professionalism of the independent forensic findings.

The recent forensic studies fill in a critical gap. Why the FBI neglected to perform any independent forensics on the original “Guccifer 2.0” material remains a mystery – as does the lack of any sign that the “hand-picked analysts” from the FBI, CIA, and NSA, who wrote the “Intelligence Community Assessment” dated January 6, 2017, gave any attention to forensics.

NOTE: There has been so much conflation of charges about hacking that we wish to make very clear the primary focus of this Memorandum. We focus specifically on the July 5, 2016 alleged Guccifer 2.0 “hack” of the DNC server. In earlier VIPS memoranda we addressed the lack of any evidence connecting the Guccifer 2.0 alleged hacks and WikiLeaks, and we asked President Obama specifically to disclose any evidence that WikiLeaks received DNC data from the Russians [see here and here].

Addressing this point at his last press conference (January 18), he described “the conclusions of the intelligence community” as “not conclusive,” even though the Intelligence Community Assessment of January 6 expressed “high confidence” that Russian intelligence “relayed material it acquired from the DNC … to WikiLeaks.”

Obama’s admission came as no surprise to us. It has long been clear to us that the reason the U.S. government lacks conclusive evidence of a transfer of a “Russian hack” to WikiLeaks is because there was no such transfer. Based mostly on the cumulatively unique technical experience of our ex-NSA colleagues, we have been saying for almost a year that the DNC data reached WikiLeaks via a copy/leak by a DNC insider (but almost certainly not the same person who copied DNC data on July 5, 2016).

From the information available, we conclude that the same inside-DNC, copy/leak process was used at two different times, by two different entities, for two distinctly different purposes:

-(1) an inside leak to WikiLeaks before Julian Assange announced on June 12, 2016, that he had DNC documents and planned to publish them (which he did on July 22) – the presumed objective being to expose strong DNC bias toward the Clinton candidacy; and

-(2) a separate leak on July 5, 2016, to pre-emptively taint anything WikiLeaks might later publish by “showing” it came from a “Russian hack.”

*  *  *

Mr. President:

This is our first VIPS Memorandum for you, but we have a history of letting U.S. Presidents know when we think our former intelligence colleagues have gotten something important wrong, and why. For example, our first such memorandum, a same-day commentary for President George W. Bush on Colin Powell’s U.N. speech on February 5, 2003, warned that the “unintended consequences were likely to be catastrophic,” should the U.S. attack Iraq and “justfy” the war on intelligence that we retired intelligence officers could readily see as fraudulent and driven by a war agenda.

Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the United Nations on Feb. 5. 2003, citing satellite photos which supposedly proved that Iraq had WMD, but the evidence proved bogus.

The January 6 “Intelligence Community Assessment” by “hand-picked” analysts from the FBI, CIA, and NSA seems to fit into the same agenda-driven category. It is largely based on an “assessment,” not supported by any apparent evidence, that a shadowy entity with the moniker “Guccifer 2.0” hacked the DNC on behalf of Russian intelligence and gave DNC emails to WikiLeaks.

The recent forensic findings mentioned above have put a huge dent in that assessment and cast serious doubt on the underpinnings of the extraordinarily successful campaign to blame the Russian government for hacking. The pundits and politicians who have led the charge against Russian “meddling” in the U.S. election can be expected to try to cast doubt on the forensic findings, if they ever do bubble up into the mainstream media. But the principles of physics don’t lie; and the technical limitations of today’s Internet are widely understood. We are prepared to answer any substantive challenges on their merits.

You may wish to ask CIA Director Mike Pompeo what he knows about this. Our own lengthy intelligence community experience suggests that it is possible that neither former CIA Director John Brennan, nor the cyber-warriors who worked for him, have been completely candid with their new director regarding how this all went down.

Copied, Not Hacked

As indicated above, the independent forensic work just completed focused on data copied (not hacked) by a shadowy persona named “Guccifer 2.0.” The forensics reflect what seems to have been a desperate effort to “blame the Russians” for publishing highly embarrassing DNC emails three days before the Democratic convention last July. Since the content of the DNC emails reeked of pro-Clinton bias, her campaign saw an overriding need to divert attention from content to provenance – as in, who “hacked” those DNC emails? The campaign was enthusiastically supported by a compliant “mainstream” media; they are still on a roll.

“The Russians” were the ideal culprit. And, after WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange announced on June 12, 2016, “We have emails related to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication,” her campaign had more than a month before the convention to insert its own “forensic facts” and prime the media pump to put the blame on “Russian meddling.” Mrs. Clinton’s PR chief Jennifer Palmieri has explained how she used golf carts to make the rounds at the convention. She wrote that her “mission was to get the press to focus on something even we found difficult to process: the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help Donald Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton.”

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton at the third debate with Republican nominee Donald Trump. (Photo credit: hillaryclinton.com)

Independent cyber-investigators have now completed the kind of forensic work that the intelligence assessment did not do. Oddly, the “hand-picked” intelligence analysts contented themselves with “assessing” this and “assessing” that. In contrast, the investigators dug deep and came up with verifiable evidence from metadata found in the record of the alleged Russian hack.

They found that the purported “hack” of the DNC by Guccifer 2.0 was not a hack, by Russia or anyone else. Rather it originated with a copy (onto an external storage device – a thumb drive, for example) by an insider. The data was leaked after being doctored with a cut-and-paste job to implicate Russia. We do not know who or what the murky Guccifer 2.0 is. You may wish to ask the FBI.

The Time Sequence

June 12, 2016: Assange announces WikiLeaks is about to publish “emails related to Hillary Clinton.”

June 15, 2016: DNC contractor Crowdstrike, (with a dubious professional record and multiple conflicts of interest) announces that malware has been found on the DNC server and claims there is evidence it was injected by Russians.

June 15, 2016: On the same day, “Guccifer 2.0” affirms the DNC statement; claims responsibility for the “hack;” claims to be a WikiLeaks source; and posts a document that the forensics show was synthetically tainted with “Russian fingerprints.”

We do not think that the June 12 & 15 timing was pure coincidence. Rather, it suggests the start of a pre-emptive move to associate Russia with anything WikiLeaks might have been about to publish and to “show” that it came from a Russian hack.

The Key Event

July 5, 2016: In the early evening, Eastern Daylight Time, someone working in the EDT time zone with a computer directly connected to the DNC server or DNC Local Area Network, copied 1,976 MegaBytes of data in 87 seconds onto an external storage device. That speed is many times faster than what is physically possible with a hack.

It thus appears that the purported “hack” of the DNC by Guccifer 2.0 (the self-proclaimed WikiLeaks source) was not a hack by Russia or anyone else, but was rather a copy of DNC data onto an external storage device. Moreover, the forensics performed on the metadata reveal there was a subsequent synthetic insertion – a cut-and-paste job using a Russian template, with the clear aim of attributing the data to a “Russian hack.” This was all performed in the East Coast time zone.

“Obfuscation & De-obfuscation”

Mr. President, the disclosure described below may be related. Even if it is not, it is something we think you should be made aware of in this general connection. On March 7, 2017, WikiLeaks began to publish a trove of original CIA documents that WikiLeaks labeled “Vault 7.” WikiLeaks said it got the trove from a current or former CIA contractor and described it as comparable in scale and significance to the information Edward Snowden gave to reporters in 2013.

No one has challenged the authenticity of the original documents of Vault 7, which disclosed a vast array of cyber warfare tools developed, probably with help from NSA, by CIA’s Engineering Development Group. That Group was part of the sprawling CIA Directorate of Digital Innovation – a growth industry established by John Brennan in 2015.

Scarcely imaginable digital tools – that can take control of your car and make it race over 100 mph, for example, or can enable remote spying through a TV – were described and duly reported in the New York Times and other media throughout March. But the Vault 7, part 3 release on March 31 that exposed the “Marble Framework” program apparently was judged too delicate to qualify as “news fit to print” and was kept out of the Times.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at a media conference in Copenhagen, Denmark. (Photo credit: New Media Days / Peter Erichsen)

The Washington Post’s Ellen Nakashima, it seems, “did not get the memo” in time. Her March 31 article bore the catching (and accurate) headline: “WikiLeaks’ latest release of CIA cyber-tools could blow the cover on agency hacking operations.”

The WikiLeaks release indicated that Marble was designed for flexible and easy-to-use “obfuscation,” and that Marble source code includes a “deobfuscator” to reverse CIA text obfuscation.

More important, the CIA reportedly used Marble during 2016. In her Washington Post report, Nakashima left that out, but did include another significant point made by WikiLeaks; namely, that the obfuscation tool could be used to conduct a “forensic attribution double game” or false-flag operation because it included test samples in Chinese, Russian, Korean, Arabic and Farsi.

The CIA’s reaction was neuralgic. Director Mike Pompeo lashed out two weeks later, calling Assange and his associates “demons,” and insisting, “It’s time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is, a non-state hostile intelligence service, often abetted by state actors like Russia.”

Mr. President, we do not know if CIA’s Marble Framework, or tools like it, played some kind of role in the campaign to blame Russia for hacking the DNC. Nor do we know how candid the denizens of CIA’s Digital Innovation Directorate have been with you and with Director Pompeo. These are areas that might profit from early White House review.

Putin and the Technology

We also do not know if you have discussed cyber issues in any detail with President Putin. In his interview with NBC’s Megyn Kelly, he seemed quite willing – perhaps even eager – to address issues related to the kind of cyber tools revealed in the Vault 7 disclosures, if only to indicate he has been briefed on them. Putin pointed out that today’s technology enables hacking to be “masked and camouflaged to an extent that no one can understand the origin” [of the hack] … And, vice versa, it is possible to set up any entity or any individual that everyone will think that they are the exact source of that attack.”

“Hackers may be anywhere,” he said. “There may be hackers, by the way, in the United States who very craftily and professionally passed the buck to Russia. Can’t you imagine such a scenario? … I can.”

Full Disclosure: Over recent decades the ethos of our intelligence profession has eroded in the public mind to the point that agenda-free analysis is deemed well nigh impossible. Thus, we add this disclaimer, which applies to everything we in VIPS say and do: We have no political agenda; our sole purpose is to spread truth around and, when necessary, hold to account our former intelligence colleagues.

We speak and write without fear or favor. Consequently, any resemblance between what we say and what presidents, politicians and pundits say is purely coincidental. The fact we find it is necessary to include that reminder speaks volumes about these highly politicized times. This is our 50^th VIPS Memorandum since the afternoon of Powell’s speech at the UN. Live links to the 49 past memos can be found at https://consortiumnews.com/vips-memos/.

FOR THE STEERING GROUP, VETERAN INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS FOR SANITY

William Binney, former NSA Technical Director for World Geopolitical & Military Analysis; Co-founder of NSA’s Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center

Skip Folden, independent analyst, retired IBM Program Manager for Information Technology US (Associate VIPS)

Matthew Hoh, former Capt., USMC, Iraq & Foreign Service Officer, Afghanistan (associate VIPS)

Larry C Johnson, CIA & State Department (ret.)

Michael S. Kearns, Air Force Intelligence Officer (Ret.), Master SERE Resistance to Interrogation Instructor

John Kiriakou, Former CIA Counterterrorism Officer and former Senior Investigator, Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Linda Lewis, WMD preparedness policy analyst, USDA (ret.)

Lisa Ling, TSgt USAF (ret.) (associate VIPS)

Edward Loomis, Jr., former NSA Technical Director for the Office of Signals Processing

David MacMichael, National Intelligence Council (ret.)

Ray McGovern, former U.S. Army Infantry/Intelligence officer and CIA analyst

Elizabeth Murray, former Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East, CIA

Coleen Rowley, FBI Special Agent and former Minneapolis Division Legal Counsel (ret.)

Cian Westmoreland, former USAF Radio Frequency Transmission Systems Technician and Unmanned Aircraft Systems whistleblower (Associate VIPS)

Kirk Wiebe, former Senior Analyst, SIGINT Automation Research Center, NSA

Sarah G. Wilton, Intelligence Officer, DIA (ret.); Commander, US Naval Reserve (ret.)

Ann Wright, U.S. Army Reserve Colonel (ret) and former U.S. Diplomat

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/

Former U.N. Amb. Power Unmasked ‘Hundreds’ In Final Year Of Obama Admin

Congress moves closer to detailing potentially illicit national security leaks

By: Adam Kredo

Former United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power is believed to have made “hundreds” of unmasking requests to identify individuals named in classified intelligence community reports related to Trump and his presidential transition team, according to multiple sources who said the behavior is unprecedented for an official in her position.

Power was first identified by the Washington Free Beacon last month as a central figure in a congressional investigation into efforts by senior Obama administration officials to obtain classified intelligence information in what many allege was an effort to undermine President Donald Trump and his incoming national security team.

Power is believed to be the anonymous official responsible for “hundreds of unmasking requests during the final year of the Obama administration,” according to current and former U.S. officials who spoke to the Free Beacon about the ongoing investigation.

Efforts by the former Obama administration to obtain the names of Trump allies included in raw intelligence reports have fueled speculation that subsequent leaks to the press were orchestrated by the former administration and its allies in a bid to damage the current White House and smear Trump’s most senior confidantes.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R., Calif.), chair of the House Intelligence Committee, which is handling the probe, petitioned Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats last week to request his help in addressing the unmasking issue.

Nunes disclosed in his letter that the former Obama administration had “easy access” to sensitive classified information and that they may have used it to “achieve partisan political purposes, including the selective, anonymous leaking of such information.”

Congressional investigators uncovered that “one official [whose] position has no apparent intelligence-related function”—now believed to be Power—”made hundreds of unmasking requests during the final year of the Obama administration.”

Little justification was provided for the request of this sensitive classified information, which government insiders described as outside the purview of a U.N. ambassador.

“Of those requests, only one offered a justification that was not boilerplate and articulated why that specific official required the personal information for the performance of his or her official duties,” according to Nunes.

One former senior U.S. official intimately familiar with the national security infrastructure told the Free Beacon that Power would have little reason to be requesting such information, particularly information that included in raw intelligence reports related to Trump and his team.

“Asking for an unmasking is rare at the [National Security Council] or the State Department. It is frankly shocking that anyone would be asking for dozens, and if there are really hundreds it is indefensible,” said the former official. “It does make me wonder why [National Security Agency] didn’t stop her [Power], by questioning this practice and getting the head of NSA to raise it with the president or the national security adviser.”

In addition to Power, the House Intelligence Committee has subpoenaed former National Security Adviser Susan Rice and other top officials as part of its investigation into these leaks.

Lawmakers, including those on the Intelligence Committee and House Oversight Committee, also have expressed interest in speaking with former National Security Council member Ben Rhodes, the former administration official responsible for creating an in-house pro-Iran “echo chamber” to mislead the public and press about the terms of the landmark Iran nuclear deal.

Rhodes has been identified by leading lawmakers as a primary suspect in the leak campaign, which included disclosing the names of Trump officials and associates in the press in order to discredit the current administration.

“The [intelligence] committee also understands that Obama-era officials sought the identification of Trump transition officials within intelligence reports,” according to Nunes’s letter. “However, there was no meaningful explanations offered by these officials as to why they needed or how the would use this U.S. personal information, and thus, the committee is left with the impression that these officials may have used this information for improper purposes, including the possibility of leaking.”

“More pointedly,” the letter states, “some of the requests for unminimized U.S. person information were followed by anonymous leaks of those names to the media.”

Nunes’s office would not comment on the matter.

Rep. Ron DeSantis (R., Fla.), a member of the House Oversight Committee and chair of its national security subcommittee, told the Free Beacon that the investigation is moving in the right direction.

DeSantis first publicly named Rhodes and other senior Obama administration members as the likely source of these classified leaks last month in an interview with the Free Beacon.

“The startling number of ‘unmaskings’ of American citizens made by Obama administration officials has undermined confidence in our intelligence protocols and Chairman Nunes is right to seek new legislation,” DeSantis told the Free Beacon Wednesday, referring to new legislation that would tighten the reins on unmasking efforts.

“I applaud the committee’s interest in scrutinizing the behavior of Obama-era officials like Samantha Power, Ben Rhodes, and Susan Rice,” DeSantis said. “We need to know what they did with highly classified information.”

One veteran congressional adviser who has been briefed by senior Intelligence Committee members told the Free Beacon that the emergence of Power’s role in these unmasking efforts could point to the improper use of this information, given her unrelated role at the U.N.

“The outrage about Obama officials spying on Americans, let alone on the Republican candidate and then incoming president, is both real and legitimate,” said the source, who would only discuss the sensitive matter on background. “But there are still a lot of known unknowns, which could make things a lot worse.”

“The Obama folks may have made a deliberate decision to use Power, even though they knew it would risk giving away their unmasking campaigns, because she had no business making those requests,” the source said. “What was so bad they had to use her for the requests, rather than someone who would have had a better excuse but may have balked?”

Source: http://freebeacon.com/national-security/former-u-n-amb-power-unmasked-hundreds-last-year-obama-admin/

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/former-u-n-amb-power-unmasked-hundreds-in-final-year-of-obama-admin/

Seth Rich Was Partying With Imran Awan On Night Of His Murder

According to Trump confidante Roger Stone, disgraced Debbie Wasserman Schultz aide Imran Awan was with former DNC staffer Seth Rich on the night of his murder.

Rich was murdered in an upscale area of Washington DC on July 10 last year but the killer or killers did not steal anything from the victim, rendering the police’s explanation that the incident was a robbery gone wrong doubtful.

Infowars reported on the questions surrounding Seth Rich’s murder multiple times back in August last year, including how there was around an hour and a half of “unaccounted for” time between Rich leaving a bar and being killed.

Brad Bauman, a crisis communications manager for the Democratic Party, was hired by Rich’s family to act as their spokesman.

Bauman’s first action was to insist that people stop questioning the unsolved circumstances behind Rich’s murder.

Now Trump confidante Roger Stone claims that Imran Awan, Florida Democrat Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s information technology (IT) administrator, was with Seth Rich before he was murdered…. MORE ON INFOWARS.COM.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/seth-rich-was-partying-with-imran-awan-on-night-of-his-murder/

Justin Trudeau: The Insanity Of Liberalism

Trudeau is nothing but a summer camp counselor, dressed in a fine-tailored suit, running a country.

By Taylor Foland

Canada’s snowflake, Justin Trudeau just did something truly unimaginable. Omar Khadr, a convicted jihadi, was just awarded a $10.5 million settlement for killing one U.S. serviceman, and blinding another. The jihadi was on the battlefield in Afghanistan in July of 2002. The jihadi threw a grenade at U.S. Army Delta Force Medic Sgt. First Class Christopher Speer, killing him, and blinding Army Sgt. First Class Layne Morris.

The jihadi was captured, and on October 27, 2002 he pled guilty to five war-crime charges at Guantanamo Bay, before a war-crimes commission board. In what reality is a world leader living in, when they issue $10.5 million to a convicted jihadist? Trudeau not only handed Khadr all the money, but also issued a formal apology to the terrorist. Omar Khadr spent ten years at GITMO, from the sentence that was originally adjudicated, which was forty years. Due to a pre-trial arrangement that forty-year sentence was reduced to only eight years. In 2012, Khadr was then handed over to Canada to serve out the remainder of the sentence.

Canada’s Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that Omar Khadr’s imprisonment at Guantanamo Bay, violated Canada’s standards when it came its detainment policy on youths. According to the Canadian Public Safety Minister, Ralph Goodale:

“It is not about previous behaviour on the battlefield in Afghanistan; it is about the acts and other decisions the Canadian Government took against Mr. Khadr after he was captured and detained.”

So much for public safety in Canada.

Condemnation from Canada’s Supreme Court, and Public Safety Minister for the appropriate age to detain an Islamic terrorist, but no condemnation when it comes to jihadism? Where is the condemnation when it comes to the killing of a US service member, and the severe maiming of another? Where is the justice? Where is the respect by the Canadian government for its own military forces? Where is the respect for the United States?

It is shameful that a world leader would issue millions of dollars to a radical Islamic terrorist, less than three months before 9/11. Americans will mark the sixteenth anniversary since the Twin Towers fell, the Pentagon was attacked, Flight 93 went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and over 2,900 American lives were lost. Shame on you, Justin Trudeau.

The age of a jihadi does not matter, there is nothing stopping a jihadist from killing infidels, or from serving the will of Allah. These are people that train their children to become terrorists. These are people who call for jihad against our president. These are people that throw gays off rooves. These are people that blow up churches on Easter Sunday. These are people who support the Muslim Brotherhood. These are people who shout: ‘Death to America!’. These are people that walk on the faces of President Trump and Prime Minister of Israel: Benjamin Netanyahu in the streets of Tehran.

Why so much money from Trudeau’s government? Ahmed Khadr (Omar’s father) was a Canadian financier, who moved to Afghanistan in the 1980s, and was later charged in the 1995 Egyptian Embassy Bombing in Islamabad, Pakistan. In Afghanistan, Ahmed Khadr had connections with Al-Qaeda and its leader Osama bin Laden.

Abdurahman Khadr was also indicted on terrorism-related charges at Guantanamo also. Abdullah Khadr, the oldest son of Ahmed Khadr, is also a suspected terrorist and Al-Qaeda member. Zaynab Khadr, the oldest member of the Khadr family is also a suspected terrorist, and alleged member of Al-Qaeda. Zaynab was detained in Turkey in 2016, her whereabouts are still murky. She publicly declared support for Osama bin Laden and praised her own martyrdom.

When asked about his family in an interview with the Toronto Star, and Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Omar Khadr said:

“They have said things that was not very smart — that they shouldn’t have said. They’re very opinionated.”

“I think that they are good people. (But) they haven’t been able to deal with the past and the present. They’re really struggling. Some of my siblings have completely cut off their pasts and some of them are living in the past and not accepting the present.” Interesting.

These people are not good people. These people are terrorists. The jihad within this family is stunning, what is even more stunning is that a Western Government would subsidize it. Jihadis are produced differently, some are self-radicalized by ISIS propaganda and jihadi publications like ‘Rumiyah’, others learn it within the culture. Jihadis should not receive government funds for terrorism. Where is all the money for Christopher Speer’s widow? For Sergeant First Class Layne Morris? A sixteen-year-old jihadist is just as dangerous, if not more dangerous, than any other on the battlefield.

It is a travesty that a terrorist, with terrorist ties, within a family of known terrorists would cash-out on a payment of over eight million dollars, while we have our veterans who struggle every day from the injuries inflicted upon them, from jihadists exactly like Omar Khadr.

Where is Justin Trudeau in all this? In a live-televised statement to CBC, the disgraced Canadian Prime Minister had these words to say:

“I can understand Canadians concerns about the settlement, in fact I share those concerns about the money, that’s why we settled. If we had continued to fight this, not only would we have inevitably lost, but estimates range from 30 to 40 million dollars that would have ended up costing the government. So, this was the responsible path to take. The measure of a society, of a just society, is not whether we stand up for people’s rights when it’s easy or popular to do so, it’s whether we recognize rights when it’s difficult, when it’s unpopular.”

“We are a society that stands up for people’s rights, and when governments fail to respect people’s rights, we all end up paying. I think that is the lesson that hopefully future governments will draw from this settlement.”

Really Prime Minister?

This is not leadership, this is COWARDICE. What about the rights of Christopher Speer’s widow, what about the rights of Sergeant Morris? The government of Canada is directly complicit in the agenda of the Islamists. This is what Islamists do, Islamists use the court systems to their advantage, to get what they want.

Trudeau is nothing but a summer camp counselor, dressed in a fine-tailored suit, running a country.

This article is dedicated to Sergeant First Class Christopher Speer, Sergeant First Class Layne Morris, and their families. Thank you for your service to our great country.

 

Taylor Foland is a Volunteer Coordinator for ACT For America, the nation’s largest grassroots national security group. ACT has over 750,000 members and 1,000 allied volunteers groups across America.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/justin-trudeau-the-insanity-of-liberalism/

SHAME ON McCAIN

By Roger Stone

It is with much relief to hear that Senator John McCain is back in the senate after his brain surgery.  The speed of his recuperation is amazing for anyone, especially a man of his 80 years.  Although we were saddened and concerned when the announcement told us of his medical issues, we continue to hold the opinion that Senator McCain is not only a thorn in President Trump’s side, but a hypocrite and back stabber as well.  Harsh words?  Let’s take a look at what the problem with McCain is.

Firstly, it should be no secret that McCain harbors a deep jealous contempt for President Trump for winning the votes of his party.  McCain has tried for years to get that honor.  McCain feels he’s more qualified to be the leader of the free world, he feels he’s more presidential than Mr. Trump and he made his point perfectly clear when he announced that he would not be attending the Republican National Convention in April of 2016.

McCain is revered by many republicans for his honesty and maverick opinions and ideals.  So when John McCain publicly disrespects the President-elect it reveals a weak and divided  GOP.  Yet McCain has stated several times how Trump is hurting the GOP brand and more recently that Obama was better than Trump “as far as American leadership was concerned.”   McCain and Trump have been trading verbal jabs, both private and public since early 2015.  For a detailed list of these criticisms you can follow the link.

There are much more serious concerns over John McCain than his disrespect and lack of loyalty to his president.

THE McCAIN CONNECTION TO THE FAKE RUSSIAN DOSSIER

Back in May, it was McCain who called for creating a special congressional committee to investigate whether Trump had colluded with the Russians to influence the 2016 election.  “Removal of Director Comey only confirms need for select committee to investigate”  McCain tweeted.  These were serious charges as we know.

What shows McCain’s backstabbing hatred for Trump and the level of  his viscous hypocrisy is that unbeknownst at that time, it was John McCain who  practically started this whole Trump/ Russian collusion thing in the first place.  What’s is now known fact is that  McCain deliberately passed a dossier on Trump/Russia collusion to the FBI which he new to be a complete fake.

As far back as January 17, 2017 McCain said on Fox & Friends  “The fact that this un-validated document, to say the least was leaked -it’s somebody’s responsibility.”  “The very fact that it was leaked, one, is a commentary on this town,” he said.  “Second, [It is]  totally wrong to have that out.”  “It is an un-validated document that is damning out there among the American public without any validation whatsoever. And so it’s harmful to the president of the United States.”  Sounds to me like he’s defending the president.  Calling for a congressional investigation one minute and denouncing the leaked dossier the next reveals his plan to discredit and possibly impeach President Trump.  It shows what a deranged and bitter man McCain really is.  Sore loser anybody?  It gets worse.

 

McCAIN LEAKS FAKE FILES

New details from a related lawsuit show how David Kramer—employed by the nonprofit and purportedly non-political McCain Institute—acted as a representative of McCain in the Arizona senator’s dealings on sensitive intelligence measures. It also reveals that McCain was one of a just few people with whom the dossier’s author, ex-British spy Christopher Steele, shared a copy of his final findings.  The dossier was prepared by Steele in December 2016 from work he had done for Fusion GPS, a consulting firm paid by anti Trump Republicans and by Hillary Clinton supporters to create evidence of Trump’s alleged financial and political ties to Russia.

It amounted to a collection of uncorroborated reports of collusion gathered as political research for sale to Trump’s opponents.  Former British ambassador to Moscow Sir Andrew Wood admitted to discussing the dossier with McCain who then obtained it through other channels.   The”other channels” turns out to be David Kramer and according to the lawsuit “arranged to meet with Sir Andrew, as the representative of Senator McCain in order to show him the pre-election memorandum on a confidential basis.”

The court document goes on to show that it was Sir Andrew Wood’s understanding that “the Trump dossier would only be used by Senator McCain in his official capacity for the sole purpose of analyzing, investigating, and verifying their contents.”  So what did the good senator do?   He gives it to FBI Director Comey who then starts an investigation into Russian collusion.  I guess McCain forgot to mention that the dossier was fabricated by an ex British spy funded by Clinton supporters and anti Trump Republicans.  It gets even worse.  The same foreign lobbyists and Russians tied to the Trump probe were once associated to Senator John McCain when he ran for president. 

 

McCAIN’S RUSSIAN COLLUSION

McCain’s situation involved the same foreign lobbyist Paul Manafort; one of the same Russian oligarchs, Oleg Deripaska; the same Russian diplomat, Sergey Kislyak, and the same wily Russian leader, Vladimir Putin, that are being investigated in the Trump probe.  The only real difference in the two cases is that the FBI has said there is no evidence to date that Trump ever met with a Russian figure banned from the United States.  McCain actually met with Deripaska, a Russian businessman whose visa was blocked by the US because of concerns by the Intelligence Community over his ties to Moscow.  McCain was warned by US Intelligence about these connections.

McCain met with Deripaska on two occasions.  The meetings were set up by Paul Manafort and his partner Rick Davis.  Davis would later become McCain’s campaign manager.  .“My sense is that Davis and Manafort, who were already doing pro-Putin work against American national interests, were using potential meetings with McCain — who didn’t know this and neither did we until after the fact — as bait to secure more rubles from the oligarchs,” John Weaver, one of McCain’s top advisers at the time, told Circa in an interview this month.

While McCain was loudly pressing for a Trump investigation he was keeping quiet about his own ties to those who sought Russian influence in America.   McCain has stated in his own defense that in giving the (fake) dossier to Comey, he was doing what he thought was the right thing.  “Liar” I say.  He knew that if he gave it to Comey then an investigation would eventually happen.

We’re glad that McCain is back at work.  It would have been a shame if we lost him.  As it is now, there is still time to drag his ass in front of the inquisitors and expose him for what he really is, a bitter, resentful, backstabbing, manipulator whose time is almost up.

 

https://www.circa.com/story/2017/06/21/heres-the-russia-influence-controversy-that-john-mccain-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about

https://www.circa.com/story/2017/05/17/politics/john-mccain-said-trumps-scandals-are-reaching-watergate-size-and-scale

https://www.circa.com/story/2017/06/12/politics/john-mccain-said-obama-is-better-than-trump-as-far-as-american-leadership-is-concerned

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article160622854.html

 

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/shame-on-mccain/

Mad Maxine: The Wicked Witch Of The West

Mad Maxine has sponsored and written little legislation while being the district’s representative. Yet, she is still being allowed to collect a check from the Federal Government, for doing nothing but resisting President Trump.

By Taylor Foland

Many Americans are sick and tired of the Democratic Party, also known as: the Democratic Plantation. Maxine Waters, the liberal left’s figurehead of “the resistance” is up to no good, yet again. She addressed an audience on Saturday, July 1^st, 2017 in New Orleans, Louisiana at the ESSENCE Festival.

She aimed her hate at Dr. Carson by stating: “Carson knows nothing about the mission of HUD”, “doesn’t care about people in public housing”, “he believes that if you’re poor, it is your own fault”, and “he doesn’t know the difference between an immigrant and a slave.” She then threatened the HUD Secretary by saying that when Mr. Carson appears before my committee: “I am going to take his ass apart.”

This should NOT be the conduct of a member of the Congress. The 43^rd District of California has been gripped with poverty, and homelessness. While the homeless roam the streets, Waters lives in one of the most luxurious neighborhoods in Los Angeles, in a 4.3-million-dollar, 4,000 square foot home. This is puzzling, because Waters has been the district’s representative since 2013, and has been in politics 37 years, yet keeps getting re-elected. How is this possible?

Mad Maxine has sponsored and written little legislation while being the district’s representative. Yet, she is still being allowed to collect a check from the Federal Government, for doing nothing but resisting President Trump. She’s been in Washington D.C. for over twenty years! What does she have to show for all this work in the Congress? In all her recent votes, not one of them was on combating the poverty and homelessness within her own district. On her official biography on her website, there is not one single piece of legislation listed that she has written and fought to pass.

Her bio simply states: “Throughout her 37 years of public service, Maxine Waters has been on the cutting edge, tackling difficult and often controversial issues. She has combined her strong legislative and public policy acumen and high visibility in Democratic Party activities with an unusual ability to do grassroots organizing.” It only lists what she did during her 14 years in the California State Assembly, that’s it. She has made: “IMPEACH 45!” her only message to Americans.

Homelessness is actually the biggest problem in her district. Let’s look at the facts of District 43 in California, when it comes to people WITHOUT housing. According to the Los Angeles Times, the homelessness rate in Los Angeles County has jumped to 23%. Inglewood, California is in Southwestern LA County, its homelessness problem is growing also. According to the South Bay Coalition To End Homelessness, in a study recorded on January 28, 2015 there were: (at least) 555 total persons in the City of Inglewood alone that were homeless.

In their study, South Bay Coalition surveyed different areas around, and in the district to record the number of the homeless in 2015. Their results speak volumes: the most densely populated areas where people are unsheltered are: Wilmington (465), West Athens (277), Inglewood (262), San Pedro (246), and Redondo Beach (165). Areas with the highest number of persons living in vehicles: Wilmington (241), Harbor Gateway (131), Carson (124), San Pedro (89), and West Athens (73). Areas with the highest number of persons on the street: Wilmington (224), Inglewood (207), West Athens (204), San Pedro (157), and Redondo Beach (97). In the greater Los Angeles area: 2,986 were counted as homeless. When the study was conducted, 78% were unsheltered.

South Bay also released their homeless numbers for 2016, the numbers are up from 2015, increasing by 22%, close to the reporting of the LA Times. Numbers have increased from 3,006 in 2015, to 3,663. According to their official page, South Bay released statistics between 2013-2016, in which they found that there was a 103% increase “in the number of people living in an unsheltered situation.

Given this data, you would think that the Congresswoman would have a section on her website dedicated to combating homelessness, wouldn’t you? No, she has no information in her issues that deals with combating homelessness at all. She only brings homelessness up on her official website by saying: “Homelessness has increased by 20 percent in Los Angeles since 2014, and this proposal had the potential to put more people at risk of becoming homeless” (referring to a public housing sector dispute with Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles).

Maxine Waters goes on to list more nonsense on her “leadership.” She has been labeled as a: “poverty pimp” within her own district. With the problems of poverty and homelessness gripping her district, and across the district line in Venice Beach, hopefully the good people of the forty-third District will vote her out.

Maxine Waters opponent Omar Navarro.

Omar Navarro, is challenging Waters for her seat in 2018, and is gaining more ground in the forty-third district with each passing day. Omar Navarro’s campaign slogan: “Fighting For Your Family” is a welcome change for once in the district, since Maxine Waters has been representing the state of California for over twenty years, and has little to show for it. (Except a 4.3-million-dollar mansion.)

Before Maxine Waters was the queen of the snowflake army in the west, she didn’t live in a 4.3-million-dollar mansion. It begs the question: ‘how does somebody enter politics, and then becomes richer, now, than the day they went in?’

The basic answer to this question is very simple: there are two types of people who run for office: (especially at the federal level) the first category of people are the ones who are interested in upholding the checks and balances in our government, and then there is the other category of people: the ones who are interested in getting the CHECKS.

In conclusion, the Liberal Democrats are obstructionists. Maxine Waters is a massive hypocrite, and she is completely insane. NO, Mad Maxine, it’s YOU who doesn’t understand the poor! Maxine, before you attack Dr. Carson, look at your own leadership in your district.

On November 6^th, 2018, there will be a reckoning at the polls, there will be a rapture at the ballot box. Maxine, on November 6^th, 2018 the people of the forty-third district are going to vote you out! Can you imagine if Maxine Waters and Omar Navarro have a televised debate? That would be interesting!

 

Taylor Foland is a Volunteer Coordinator for ACT For America, the nation’s largest grassroots national security group. ACT has over 750,000 members and 1,000 allied volunteers groups across America.

from
https://stonecoldtruth.com/mad-maxine-the-wicked-witch-of-the-west/